<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>credit Archives - SmartFrame</title>
	<atom:link href="https://smartframe.io/blog/tag/credit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://smartframe.io/blog/tag/credit/</link>
	<description>Ideal Presentation, Robust Protection and Easy Monetization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2025 14:29:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Do you own the copyright to a photo of yourself? Probably not – and here’s why</title>
		<link>https://smartframe.io/blog/do-you-own-the-copyright-to-a-photo-of-yourself-probably-not-and-heres-why/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Image security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smartframe.io/?p=77740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Following a number of cases in which celebrities have been sued for [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/do-you-own-the-copyright-to-a-photo-of-yourself-probably-not-and-heres-why/">Do you own the copyright to a photo of yourself? Probably not – and here’s why</a> appeared first on <a href="https://smartframe.io">SmartFrame</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="77740" class="elementor elementor-77740" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-15ea5fbc e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="15ea5fbc" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_has_onepagescroll_dot&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;}">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-3cb37dba elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="3cb37dba" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_we_effect_on&quot;:&quot;none&quot;}" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
									<p class="blog-stand-first">Following a number of cases in which celebrities have been sued for posting photos of themselves on social media without permission, we explore the rules around this aspect of copyright law</p>
<p><a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/can-you-post-photos-of-others-on-social-media-heres-what-you-need-to-know/">Our recent article</a> on the rules around posting photographs of other people on social media explained the various restrictions that different platforms imposed. But when it comes to posting photos of yourself, what&#8217;s actually allowed?</p>
<p>Believe it or not, being the subject of a photograph doesn’t necessarily mean you own the rights to it. Indeed, there has been a flurry of cases in recent years in which high-profile celebrities from the worlds of sport, music, and reality TV have found themselves in trouble after posting photos of themselves to social media without permission from the copyright holder.</p>
<p>Here, we take a closer look at the rules, list some specific examples of subjects being accused of copyright infringement on social media, and discuss ways in which all parties can protect themselves.</p>
<h4>Do you own the copyright to photos of yourself?</h4>
<p>Not necessarily. While privacy laws were put in place to protect the subjects of photographs, copyright laws are designed to protect the creators. As explained in the USA’s <a href="https://www.copyright.gov/title17/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Copyright Act of 1976</a> and the UK’s <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/contents" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988</a>, the copyright to any photograph, regardless of who or what it features, falls by default to the person who took it.</p>
<p>The main exception to this is when there has been some kind of contractual agreement beforehand, such as when an individual takes photographs during their employment. This could be a photographer who is shooting on behalf of a commercial organization, for example, or a staff photojournalist working for a newspaper.</p>
<p>While there are some exemptions, listed for the US <a href="https://www.copyright.gov/fair-use/more-info.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a> and the UK <a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/exceptions-to-copyright" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>, it is safest to assume that unless a subject of a photo has been assigned the copyright – or indeed, the photo is a selfie – they need to seek permission from the copyright holder before they can publish it.</p>
<p><strong>Learn more: <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/copyright-and-images-what-you-need-to-know/">Copyright and images: What you need to know</a></strong></p>
<p>If asked, it is unlikely that your best friend will mind you using a photo they took of you as your personal profile picture. On the contrary, they will probably be quite flattered. The same could be true even for a professional who took your photo at a relative’s wedding. Many photographers will simply request that they be credited.</p>
<p>Problems arise in the eyes of the photographer – and the law – if subjects use the images for commercial gain without prior permission. If there is evidence to suggest a photographer has lost earnings from such action, they will likely seek reimbursement.</p>
<p><script async src="https://static.smartframe.io/embed.js"></script><smartframe-embed customer-id="7d0b78d6f830c45ae5fcb6734143ff0d" image-id="shutterstock_719491435_1657798213343" theme="blog-new" style="width: 100%; display: inline-flex; aspect-ratio: 5315/3543; max-width: 5315px;"></smartframe-embed></p>
<!-- https://smartframe.io/embedding-support -->
<h4>Photographer vs subject copyright infringement case examples</h4>
<p>Here are a few recent examples of image owners filing lawsuits against subjects for publishing photographs of themselves without permission.</p>
<h3>Robert Barbera sues Dua Lipa</h3>
<p>New York-based photographer Robert Barbera is currently <a href="https://www.billboard.com/pro/dua-lipa-lawsuit-paparazzi-photos-instagram/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">suing</a> British singer Dua Lipa for allegedly publishing photos he took of her in 2018 without his permission.</p>
<p>The photographs were posted to the singer’s Instagram page in 2019. Barbera argues that because the page is used to promote Lipa&#8217;s music and brand, his work benefited her financially.</p>
<p>Barbera is therefore seeking actual damages, disgorgement of all profits linked to the infringement, and court costs.</p>
<p>Both parties have form. Lipa faced a similar <a href="https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.825154/gov.uscourts.cacd.825154.1.0.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">case</a> brought by Integral Images in July 2021, while Barbera has previously filed lawsuits against <a href="https://www.nme.com/news/music/ariana-grande-sued-by-photographer-for-posting-photo-of-herself-2490058" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ariana Grande</a> and <a href="https://www.billboard.com/pro/justin-bieber-settles-copyright-lawsuit-paparazzi-photo-instagram/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Justin Bieber</a>.</p>
<p>The case is ongoing.</p>
<h3>Backgrid sues Lisa Rinna</h3>
<p>Photo agency Backgrid brought a copyright infringement <a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21076010/rinna-complaint-clean.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">case</a> against reality TV star Lisa Rinna in June 2021, claiming she published photographs they own of her without its permission.</p>
<p>The photographs, which were taken by paparazzi photographers represented by Backgrid, were posted to Rinna’s Instagram account. At the time, Rinna had 2.7 million followers.</p>
<p>Backgrid launched a legal campaign demanding $1.2m in statutory damages, claiming loss of income. Rinna <a href="https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21076011/rinna-answer-clean.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">responded</a> by asking the judge to dismiss the case, saying Backgrid “effectively weaponized the Copyright Act to augment its income.”</p>
<p>The two parties have <a href="https://petapixel.com/2022/06/27/actress-who-said-paparazzi-weaponize-copyright-settles-lawsuit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reportedly</a> now settled with the court, avoiding the need for a public trial.</p>
<h3>Steven Mitchell sues LeBron James</h3>
<p>Sports photographer Steven Mitchell sued LA Lakers basketball player LeBron James for using a picture he took of James dunking the ball against the Miami Heat in 2019.</p>
<p>The suit was filed in March 2020 against both James and his companies, Uninterrupted Digital Ventures and LRMR Ventures LLC, which Mitchell says manage the player’s Facebook page.</p>
<p>According to <a href="https://heitnerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/LeBron-James-Copyright-Lawsuit.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">court </a><a href="https://heitnerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/LeBron-James-Copyright-Lawsuit.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">documents</a>, Mitchell was seeking profits made from the Facebook post, or $150,000 for every time James used the image.</p>
<p>Interestingly, James responded by filing a <a href="https://theathletic.com/2279041/2020/12/22/lebron-james-photographer-lawsuit/?source=rss" target="_blank" rel="noopener">countersuit</a> against Mitchell for $1m, arguing that Mitchell was unlawfully using photographs of James on his website to promote his business.</p>
<p>In the end, both parties reached a <a href="https://theathletic.com/2365850/2021/02/03/lebron-james-lakers-settle-photographer-lawsuit/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">settlement</a> outside of court that resulted in the closing of both lawsuits in February 2021.</p>
<p><script async src="https://static.smartframe.io/embed.js"></script><smartframe-embed customer-id="7d0b78d6f830c45ae5fcb6734143ff0d" image-id="shutterstock_752231824_1657798213563" theme="blog-new" style="width: 100%; display: inline-flex; aspect-ratio: 4500/3003; max-width: 4500px;"></smartframe-embed></p>
<!-- https://smartframe.io/embedding-support -->
<h4>Why does this keep happening?</h4>
<p>The above cases are just a small selection of recent examples. Celebrities such as <a href="https://petapixel.com/2022/07/05/la-lakers-player-sued-by-same-photographer-who-fought-lebron-james/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Kendrick Nunn</a>, <a href="https://petapixel.com/2017/04/28/khloe-kardashian-sued-posting-copyrighted-photo-instagram/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Khloe Kardashian</a>, <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/pop-culture-news/gigi-hadid-sued-over-unauthorized-posting-photo-instagram-n964351" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Gigi Hadid</a>, and <a href="https://petapixel.com/2022/06/22/photographer-sues-emily-ratajkowski-for-posting-his-photo-on-instagram" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Emily Ratajkowski</a> have all found themselves in similar situations. But why does this keep happening?</p>
<p>Arguably the biggest reason for the increase in cases like this is the free-sharing nature of social media, which provides access to enormous audiences that are often completely out of the publisher’s control. When combined with increasingly blurred lines between editorial and commercial content, you have a recipe for litigation.</p>
<p>At the heart of the problem sit the insecure image formats that are used online. Formats like JPEG, PNG, GIF, and others can easily be copied and redistributed with minimal effort.</p>
<p>This lack of protection leaves the images open to theft, but it is important to remember that not all theft is deliberate.</p>
<p>The fact that these images can be so easily copied and misappropriated means that users unfamiliar with copyright law are often stealing them without even realizing they are doing anything wrong.</p>
<h4>Preventing copyright infringement</h4>
<p>Several measures can be taken to protect both parties, such as <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/what-makes-a-good-watermark/">watermarking</a>, <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/low-resolution-images-make-sense-from-the-perspective-of-security-theres-just-one-problem/">downsampling</a>, and <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/how-to-attach-copyright-information-to-every-image-you-take/">adding copyright information</a> to image captions or metadata.</p>
<p>However, none of these offer a comprehensive solution that finds the right blend of strong protection and compelling presentation.</p>
<p>For example, effective watermarking and downsampling sacrifice image quality by either obscuring the image or reducing its resolution, while standard captions are not permanently attached to the image, and metadata can be easily deleted – if it is ever actually seen in the first place.</p>
<p>The most comprehensive solution out there is the use of <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/image-streaming-how-it-works-why-you-need-it-and-everything-else-you-need-to-know/">image-streaming</a> technology. In a nutshell, it is a new way to display images online that provides a more secure and engaging alternative to the current file formats.</p>
<p>With image streaming, the content owner uploads a high-resolution image file to a secure central server and streams it to websites using an embed code – much like embedding a YouTube video.</p>
<p>This makes it possible for an image to appear on unlimited web pages without a single copy being made.</p>
<p>Each image is displayed in high resolution with interactive features such as <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/spotlight-hyper-zoom/">multi-level zoom</a> and <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/spotlight-smartframes-full-screen-viewing-mode/">full-screen viewing</a> while maintaining fast page-loading times. This creates the perfect balance between quality, security, and user experience.</p>
<p>If fully integrated, image streaming could revolutionize social media networks, providing a safer and even more engaging place to connect. Below is a rundown of how the technology can benefit all parties involved.</p>
<h5>Benefits to content owners</h5>
<p>For content owners, there are a number of benefits when using our technology starting with full distribution control over their images, allowing them to monitor and manage where their content appears across the web.</p>
<p>Through a comprehensive list of URLs, owners can easily track unauthorized use and promptly block domains whenever needed.</p>
<p>As well as that, our theft protection features make it significantly harder for images to be stolen, with measures against right-clicks and screenshot attempts.</p>
<p>Permanent attribution is ensured through embedded captions and credits, guaranteeing that images are always correctly attributed, regardless of where they&#8217;re shared.</p>
<p>Lastly, image analytics are provided to give the creators valuable insights into viewership metrics such as detailed data on image views and their origins.</p>
<h5>Benefits to content sharers</h5>
<p>For content sharers, our platform offers customizable deterrent messages triggered by right-click or screenshot attempts.</p>
<p>These messages inform users about copyright protection and direct them to the terms and conditions of sharing, educating them on legal sharing practices and preventing unintentional theft.</p>
<p>Like content owners, sharers benefit from permanent attribution, as embedded captions and credits accompany images wherever they&#8217;re shared, ensuring proper crediting and contextual integrity.</p>
<h5>Benefits to social media platforms</h5>
<p>By streaming every displayed image from a single source file, social media platforms can better police and trace images back to their origin, making it a more manageable task and enabling swift action if necessary.</p>
<p>Our controlled distribution options, including optional sharing buttons, help platforms maintain exclusivity over shared content, ensuring images remain within the intended platform ecosystem.</p>
<h4>Calls for changes to the law</h4>
<p>Following her experience, Emily Ratajkowski wrote an <a href="https://www.thecut.com/article/emily-ratajkowski-owning-my-image-essay.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">article</a> for <em>The Cut</em> that raised questions about the rights people have to photographs of themselves. Her view is shared by other celebrities such as <a href="https://petapixel.com/2022/03/09/snoop-dogg-photographers-shouldnt-own-their-photos-of-celebrities/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Snoop Dogg</a> and <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2019/6/24/18715675/gigi-hadid-copyright-instagram-lawsuit-paparazzi" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Gigi Hadid</a> who have both called for changes to the law.</p>
<p>Copyright law has, however, been designed to protect the creator, so image owners may argue that any exceptions could lead to abuse, especially if the image is in the public interest.</p>
<h4>Final thoughts</h4>
<p>Whatever the law says, image formats that are currently used online can easily leave all parties unprotected against image misuse, whether deliberate or not.</p>
<p>With this in mind, we believe the main focus should be on protecting those at risk by educating everyone involved on what is permissible and what isn’t, while also preventing images from being stolen in the first place.</p>								</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/do-you-own-the-copyright-to-a-photo-of-yourself-probably-not-and-heres-why/">Do you own the copyright to a photo of yourself? Probably not – and here’s why</a> appeared first on <a href="https://smartframe.io">SmartFrame</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Historic England launches Aerial Photo Explorer tool using SmartFrame&#8217;s technology</title>
		<link>https://smartframe.io/blog/historic-england-launches-aerial-photo-explorer-tool-using-smartframes-technology/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Townshend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 11:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[captions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartframe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smartframe.io/?p=75386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Historic England has launched its Aerial Photo Explorer tool, which uses SmartFrame&#8217;s [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/historic-england-launches-aerial-photo-explorer-tool-using-smartframes-technology/">Historic England launches Aerial Photo Explorer tool using SmartFrame&#8217;s technology</a> appeared first on <a href="https://smartframe.io">SmartFrame</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="75386" class="elementor elementor-75386" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-452f5b77 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="452f5b77" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_has_onepagescroll_dot&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;}">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-2dd53e7b elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="2dd53e7b" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_we_effect_on&quot;:&quot;none&quot;}" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
									<p class="blog-stand-first">Historic England has launched its Aerial Photo Explorer tool, which uses SmartFrame&#8217;s image-streaming technology to showcase hundreds of thousands of previously unavailable aerial images</p>
<p>It is now possible to gain a truly unique view of how England’s landscape has evolved over the past 100 years thanks to Historic England’s brand-new <a href="https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/archive/collections/aerial-photos/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Aerial Photo Explorer</a> tool.</p>
<p>Accessible from the <a href="https://historicengland.org.uk/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Historic England website</a>, this new feature lets visitors use an interactive map to search, scroll, and zoom in to landmarks across the country. When a location is selected, it opens a SmartFrame containing one of over 400,000 available aerial images that span an entire century.</p>
<p>By making it possible to view evidence of medieval settlements, see famous industrial landmarks in their heyday, and marvel at modern-day architectural wonders, this tool provides a fascinating glimpse into England’s past and present, while documenting its continued transformation into the future.</p>
<p>The collection is being made available as part of the ongoing digitization of over six million aerial photographs preserved in the Historic England Archive. As such, it will be continually updated with new images from the collection.</p>
<p><script async src="https://static.smartframe.io/embed.js"></script><smartframe-embed customer-id="27025fea9afa38753501b02dbd8a40f2" image-id="EAW000577" style="width: 100%; display: inline-flex; aspect-ratio: 4940/3820; max-width: 4940px;"></smartframe-embed></p>
<!-- https://smartframe.io/embedding-support -->
<h4>Enhanced user experience</h4>
<p>The Aerial Photo Explorer is a great example of how SmartFrames and their interactive features can be used by image owners and publishers to fantastic effect. The <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/spotlight-hyper-zoom/">Hyper Zoom</a> function enables viewers to zoom in to the finest details of each image, while <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/spotlight-smartframes-full-screen-viewing-mode/">full-screen viewing</a> offers an even more immersive experience, all without affecting page loading times.</p>
<p>By enabling the Share function in the top right-hand corner of each image, Historic England has also made it possible for site visitors to legally share its images on social media and even embed them on their own websites for free.</p>
<p>The latter can be achieved by simply clicking the ‘Embed’ button, copying the code, and pasting it into the text editor on the back end of a website (be sure to read Historic England’s terms and conditions beforehand).</p>
<p>By doing this, you are streaming the image from its original source file rather than making a copy, much like embedding a YouTube video.</p>
<p>Another great benefit of image-streaming is the ability to embed SmartFrame Captions at source – a feature put to good use here by Historic England. These captions ensure every image features a <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/whose-image-is-it-anyway/">permanently attached credit</a> that will follow it wherever it is streamed. Many also specify the landmark and location the image depicts, further improving the user experience.</p>
<p><script async src="https://static.smartframe.io/embed.js"></script><smartframe-embed customer-id="27025fea9afa38753501b02dbd8a40f2" image-id="EPW059929" style="width: 100%; display: inline-flex; aspect-ratio: 4908/3839; max-width: 4908px;"></smartframe-embed></p>
<!-- https://smartframe.io/embedding-support -->
<h4>Behind-the-scenes benefits</h4>
<p>The benefits for the user are clear for all to see, but there are also huge advantages behind the scenes for Historic England. By using SmartFrame’s image-streaming technology, the organization is able to better secure its images against theft while maintaining complete control over their distribution.</p>
<p>This is achieved through right-click and screenshot protection, which helps prevent bad actors from making copies of Historic England&#8217;s image files, whether intentional or otherwise. The same security protects its photographs from image-scraping bots that can steal countless files in seconds.</p>
<p>In addition to this enhanced security, SmartFrame provides Historic England with detailed image analytics, which deliver valuable insights into how users are interacting with its content.</p>
<p>It is possible to see the number of impressions each SmartFrame has enjoyed, along with the amount of engagement it has received. </p>
<p>With all this security and control, Historic England can ensure its extensive archive of images is not only protected, but always used in context and for agreeable means.</p>								</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/historic-england-launches-aerial-photo-explorer-tool-using-smartframes-technology/">Historic England launches Aerial Photo Explorer tool using SmartFrame&#8217;s technology</a> appeared first on <a href="https://smartframe.io">SmartFrame</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>C2PA: Everything you need to know about the C2PA project</title>
		<link>https://smartframe.io/blog/c2pa-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-c2pa-project/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Townshend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Image security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jpeg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[licensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smartframe.io/?p=70515</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) aims to implement a [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/c2pa-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-c2pa-project/">C2PA: Everything you need to know about the C2PA project</a> appeared first on <a href="https://smartframe.io">SmartFrame</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="70515" class="elementor elementor-70515" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-77237333 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="77237333" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_has_onepagescroll_dot&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;}">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-41e0e26a elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="41e0e26a" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_we_effect_on&quot;:&quot;none&quot;}" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
									<p class="blog-stand-first">The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) aims to implement a new standard for online content. But what exactly is it and how does it differ from existing initiatives?</p>
<p>From the safety of vaccines through to the reputation of political figures and everything in between, most people will be familiar with the idea of online audiences being intentionally misled by what they see on social media and forums. But few will be familiar with the various tools and initiatives that are currently being developed to help people understand the trustworthiness of what they see online. In this article, we examine one of the latest of these, the <a href="https://c2pa.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">C2PA</a>.</p>
<h4>What is the C2PA?</h4>
<p>The C2PA is a coming together of some of the biggest players in the tech, creative, publishing and broadcasting industries to create an open standard for content provenance and authenticity.</p>
<p>Leonard Rosenthal, Chair of the C2PA Technical Working Group and Adobe’s CAI Architect, described its goal as bringing “an open standard that can be adopted anywhere in the world, in individual organizations, in individual businesses, in industry segments. We want something that is usable anywhere and everywhere. And that&#8217;s whether we&#8217;re thinking about images, videos, audio, or documents.</p>
<p>“All we&#8217;re really saying here is we&#8217;re using some well-established mathematics and technology in the area of cryptography to be able to ensure that we can detect – or more specifically, you, as a consumer, can detect – when assets have been modified.”</p>
<h5>Who are members of the C2PA?</h5>
<p>The C2PA has over 30 members among its active contributors, including many extremely influential names, such as Adobe, Arm, BBC, Intel, Microsoft, Truepic and Twitter.</p>
<h5>Why was the C2PA formed?</h5>
<p>The aim of the C2PA is to combine the efforts of two existing initiatives designed to vouch for the integrity of digital media: <a href="https://contentauthenticity.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Content Authenticity Initiative</a> (CAI) and <a href="https://www.originproject.info/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Project Origin</a>.</p>
<h5>What is the C2PA’s mission?</h5>
<p>Laura Ellis, Head of Technology Forecasting at the BBC – one of the leading forces behind Project Origin – gave a good description of what the C2PA aims to achieve: “Given the disinformation that we&#8217;re encountering right across the media landscape, we just feel that now&#8217;s the time to be thinking about, in the long term, starting to embed these signals or align these signals to our content.</p>
<p>“If you can&#8217;t trust what you see, and you can&#8217;t trust that what you see is coming from the bona fide media organization that you believe it is, then that undermines trust right across the board for us.</p>
<p>“It&#8217;s something that we felt we needed to invest a lot of time and thought in, and we were more than delighted to find that there were like-minded people in the CAI at the time.”</p>
<h5>How is the C2PA making a difference?</h5>
<p><strong>Release of the C2PA technical specification</strong></p>
<p>On January 26, 2022, the C2PA <a href="https://c2pa.org/post/release_1_pr/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">released</a> version 1.0 of its <a href="https://c2pa.org/specifications/specifications/1.0/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">technical specification</a>, forming the basis of the world’s first industry standard for content provenance.This open-source specification is designed for easy implementation with any hardware, software, or online platform – from the smallest outfits right up to the biggest tech. Such accessibility paves the way for the widespread adoption of a global standard for digital provenance.</p>
<p>At a recent online launch event, Adobe’s Executive Vice President Dana Rao celebrated the release of the C2PA open standard as an important milestone in the journey towards restoring trust in online content, saying: “Today&#8217;s release means that everybody – software companies, social media platforms – can start building trust into their tools right now. And this is critical, because we all as a society need to be able to trust what we see, what we hear, and what we read.</p>
<p>“Being able to leverage our joint technical expertise has allowed us to create something that&#8217;s really going to work in our products and our tools and that&#8217;s the benefit of a standard that is created by and for the industry. We know what the problems are, we know how to solve them.”</p>
<p>The specification provides a comprehensive overview of the standard, covering the most technical details, while also offering a jargon-free explainer that’s designed to be accessible to all.</p>
<p>It also outlines the potential threats C2PA faces, provides detailed harms modelling, and offers information on user experience, including how C2PA information will be presented.</p>
<p><br /><strong>The Deepfake Taskforce Act</strong><br />The release of version 1.0 of the C2PA technical specification comes shortly after the United States Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee unanimously passed the <a href="https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/media/minority-media/tech-leaders-support-portmans-bipartisan-deepfake-task-force-act-to-create-task-force-at-dhs-to-combat-deepfakes#:~:text=The%20legislation%20will%20create%20a,that%20did%20not%20actually%20occur." target="_blank" rel="noopener">Deepfake Task Force Act</a>, which will create a task force at the Department of Homeland Security to tackle the ongoing threat posed by deepfake technology.</p>
<p>The act was introduced by Ohio Senator Rob Portman and Michigan Senator Gary Peters, both of whom appeared via video at the C2PA specification launch event.</p>
<p>“I&#8217;m pleased to help lead this good fight against deepfakes and to promote the authenticity of online content,” said Senator Portman.</p>
<p>“I&#8217;ve been honored to work closely with Dana Rao and teams at Adobe, Truepic, and other C2PA members to introduce new legislation to help develop standards for digital content provenance.”</p>
<p>Senator Peters continued: “This important bill will give the Department of Homeland Security additional tools to address the threats posed by deepfakes. It creates a taskforce made up of experts from government, academia, civil society, and industry, who will be charged with creating a coordinated plan to explore how the creation of a digital content provenance standard could help prevent the spread of deepfakes and disinformation.”</p>
<p>Such powerful support for the C2PA open standard is testament not only to the level of expertise that has gone into its creation, but also the level of threat that misinformation and disinformation poses to society.</p>
<h3>CAI vs Project Origin vs C2PA</h3>
<p>So, what exactly is the CAI? And what is Project Origin? And how will these fit with the C2PA project?</p>
<h5>What is the CAI?</h5>
<p>Led by Adobe, the CAI is a group that&#8217;s working on a secure end-to-end system regarding the provenance of digital content.</p>
<h5>Who are members of the CAI?</h5>
<p>The CAI was formed by Adobe, Twitter, and the New York Times, but has since added a large number of prominent names to its list of members, such as the BBC, Getty Images, Microsoft, Qualcomm, Truepic, and SmartFrame Technologies.</p>
<h5>How does the CAI work?</h5>
<p>The CAI gives photographers the option to automatically add tamper-evident time, date, location, and author details to an image at point of capture, which can then follow that image, unchanged, for the rest of its life.</p>
<p>In addition to these primary details, CAI data can be added every time that image is edited, logging anything from contrast tweaks, right through to composites. What’s more, by visiting a dedicated verification page, it’s possible to view versions of the image before and after edits, along with – if applicable – thumbnails of original images as they looked before they were combined.<br />Experience the CAI for yourself with the below image from renowned photographer <a href="https://davidyarrow.photography/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">David Yarrow</a>, displayed using SmartFrame’s image streaming technology. Simply click on the information icon in the top left-hand corner of the image.</p>
<p>To read more about the collaboration between the CAI and SmartFrame, click <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/smartframe-and-cai-working-together-to-validate-provenance-and-improve-image-protection/">here</a>.<br /><script async src="https://static.smartframe.io/embed.js"></script><smartframe-embed customer-id="8c385f50b43e4018df96a67ebdff8b32" image-id="img_20211028_173913_1637592139900" style="width: 100%; display: inline-flex; aspect-ratio: 3285/3000; max-width: 3285px;"></smartframe-embed><!-- https://smartframe.io/embedding-support --><br />While the CAI’s current focus is images, it has earmarked other content that may eventually use the set of standards under development.</p>
<p><strong>Learn more: <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/content-authenticity-initiative-what-you-need-to-know/">Content Authenticity Initiative: What you need to know</a></strong></p>
<h5>IPTC data vs CAI data</h5>
<p>So what’s the difference between the existing EXIF and <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/what-is-iptc-metadata-everything-you-need-to-know/">IPTC</a> metadata, and the standard proposed by the CAI?</p>
<p>There are three main ways that CAI improves on IPTC. The first is detail. As outlined above, the CAI not only makes it possible to log when, where and how the image was created at the point of capture, but it also continues to add to this data set as the image evolves, providing complete transparency around its provenance.</p>
<p>The second is accessibility. CAI data can be viewed at the touch of a button when an image is displayed online, making it as easy as possible for even the least tech-savvy users to access the data, without the need for any specialist software.</p>
<p>The third advantage is security. CAI data is tamper-evident, meaning that once it is added, any alterations will be clearly visible.</p>
<p><br /><iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/6NbB_Iaf6-o?si=nT-M76UjcHvgivLX" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<h5>What is Project Origin?</h5>
<p>Formed by the BBC, Microsoft, CBC/Radio Canada and the New York Times – and joint-led by the former two organizations – Project Origin is an initiative that provides a way of quickly and reliably authenticating the provenance of a piece of media online.</p>
<p>It aims to achieve a similar goal to the CAI, but for broadcast media instead of still images.</p>
<h4>How does Project Origin work?</h4>
<p>Producers can register the final edit of a production with Project Origin and give it a digital fingerprint in the process. Using this unique identifier, a tamper-proof certification of authentication is created and stored securely on a <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/492972/gs-16-1-distributed-ledger-technology.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">distributed ledger</a>. This certification can then be embedded into the media item before it is published.</p>
<p>A user’s browser will then compare the fingerprint of the media being played with the original fingerprint on the distributed ledger. If the media has been altered in any way from its original certified form, Project Origin will alert the user.<br /><iframe title="YouTube video player" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/_W3Om9Xbj2k?si=nX3k9WOaMRIT9VAU" width="560" height="315" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="allowfullscreen"></iframe></p>
<h5>How will the CAI and Project Origin work together?</h5>
<p>As outlined above, the CAI and Project Origin essentially aim to achieve the same thing in a slightly different way, for slightly different applications. And with plans in place to develop the CAI standards to include video among other types of media, the technologies would inevitably end up in competition with one another.</p>
<p>The C2PA changes all that, and while the technology may still be evolving, the collaboration between these players is firmly established.</p>
<p>“The CAI has been focused on the creator ecosystem on devices and on social media. Project Origin has been focused on the news media ecosystem, particularly on video,” explained Andy Parsons, Director of the CAI.</p>
<p>“I don’t want to leave the impression that these are the only [two] organizations,” Parsons continued, “but these have been the focal points that agreed, early on in the lifetime of the C2PA, would come together to develop technical standards in one place, and effectively learn from each other in these various ecosystems.”</p>
<h4>What has changed with the formation of the C2PA?</h4>
<p>While the overall goal of the C2PA has not changed from that which was set out in detail by both the CAI and Project Origin, the key point is that this force has been strengthened.</p>
<p>A number of powerful organizations linking arms and forging ahead in the same direction certainly bolsters the fight against misinformation and disinformation.</p>
<p>However, the C2PA is keen to stress that these specifications have been designed not to prevent bad actors from acting badly, but to instead equip users with the tools they need to make their own decisions on the trustworthiness of the content they’re viewing.</p>
<p>“We’re not saying that this piece of content can be trusted, we’re saying it comes from where it says it comes from and it’s not been manipulated on its way to you,” emphasized Ellis. “C2PA is going to help you to make those decisions, but it cannot make those decisions for you.”</p>
<h5>How will the C2PA bring transparency to the digital world?</h5>
<p>While the leaders of the new coalition are the first to acknowledge that this is the beginning of a long and challenging road to popular adoption of the standard, all agree that it will ultimately lead to a safer, better-informed digital world.</p>
<p>“Project Origin focuses on the professional news organizations and they work with their constituents to make sure we’re building the right thing,” explained Rosenthal. “CAI is doing the same sort of thing within the creative community.</p>
<p>So, it’s outreach, it’s education, it’s all these things – but all of it then comes together in the C2PA for the technical work.”</p>
<h5>What is the scope of the C2PA?</h5>
<p>With this concerted focus on educating the masses, you can expect to hear a lot more about the C2PA in the coming weeks, months, and years, in a broad spectrum of areas other than the primary – and arguably most important – areas of the media and human rights.</p>
<p>“We’ve gotten interest from a wide range of industry segments with regard to this technology – for example, the insurance industry, medical imagery, satellite imagery, the music business [and] government documents,” said Santiago Lyon, Adobe’s CAI Head of Advocacy and Education.</p>
<p>“Essentially, any piece of digital content that would benefit from more information about its provenance, regardless of where that interest arises or what the use case is. That’s how broad this is.”</p>
<p><em>This article was updated on January 28, 2022.</em></p>								</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/c2pa-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-c2pa-project/">C2PA: Everything you need to know about the C2PA project</a> appeared first on <a href="https://smartframe.io">SmartFrame</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whose image is it anyway? The importance of permanent attribution</title>
		<link>https://smartframe.io/blog/whose-image-is-it-anyway/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Golowczynski]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 11:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Image security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://smartframe.io/?p=66299</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The internet is full of images that lack any sort of attribution. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/whose-image-is-it-anyway/">Whose image is it anyway? The importance of permanent attribution</a> appeared first on <a href="https://smartframe.io">SmartFrame</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="68858" class="elementor elementor-68858" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-215070d3 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="215070d3" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_has_onepagescroll_dot&quot;:&quot;yes&quot;}">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-2c920d5b elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="2c920d5b" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-settings="{&quot;ekit_we_effect_on&quot;:&quot;none&quot;}" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
									<p style="font-size: 21px; line-height: 30px;"><b>The internet is full of images that lack any sort of attribution. The only way around this is to make it a permanent part of the image itself.</b></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">How do you prove an image is your own? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">With billions of images captured and uploaded online each day, there’s ample opportunity for someone to claim an image as their creation, and to exploit it for social likes, monetary gain or something else. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">And what’s stopping them? Sadly, not a great deal. So perhaps it&#8217;s worth tackling the issue from the opposite end, and examining what enables this to begin with.</span></p>
<h3>Proving authorship</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The ease with which images can be stolen is the most vital issue here. <a href="https://smartframe.io/image-security/">Address this</a> and you may not need to worry about the other factors that tend to affect image theft, such as misunderstandings around copyright or the likelihood of being caught, or the ease with which the data regarding provenance attached to such an image can be removed or manipulated – something we&#8217;ll come on to shortly.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But l</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">et&#8217;s assume you&#8217;re asked to prove that an image you&#8217;ve taken is indeed your own. How would you do this?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">One way would be to produce the camera’s raw file of the image, rather than just the JPEG alone. Raw files, which require processing and conversion to a mainstream format before they can be viewed online, are unlikely to be uploaded anywhere outside of cloud storage (and even this isn&#8217;t commonplace). That means that only the creator is likely to be able to produce this file on demand. </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-weight: 400;">The ability to show other images from what is evidently the same shoot could also be used as proof, although the obvious limitation to all this is that it only really applies to photographic images, rather than graphics, paintings or illustrations. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Another potentially highly accurate – if decidedly more complex – way of ascertaining whether an image originated from a particular camera would involve comparing it with the characteristics of other images from that camera. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">How does this work? Slight variations in sensitivity across the pixels of a sensor – also known as photo response non-uniformity – </span><a href="https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20210324-the-hidden-fingerprint-inside-your-photos"><span style="font-weight: 400;">can be used to determine a fingerprint of sorts</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, which would affect all images from that camera, without this being visible by simply looking at the images themselves. Still, however useful or accurate this is, this isn&#8217;t an option that&#8217;s open to the everyday user.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">What about metadata? Photographers and other creatives are often advised to embed author and copyright information within the metadata of the image. This <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/how-to-attach-copyright-information-to-every-image-you-take/">can be done in advance on a camera</a>, meaning that it can pretty much be forgotten about once enabled, or it can be added later on using software. </span></p>
<p><strong>Read more:</strong> <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/what-is-iptc-metadata-everything-you-need-to-know/">What is IPTC metadata? Everything you need to know</a></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">While this can help in the event of any dispute, the fact that this metadata can be easily changed or completely stripped away from images makes it less reliable once an image has been published.</span></p>
<p><script async src="https://static.smartframe.io/embed.js"></script><smartframe-embed customer-id="7d0b78d6f830c45ae5fcb6734143ff0d" image-id="iptc_new_1600177748676" theme="blog-new" style="width: 100%; display: inline-flex; aspect-ratio: 1268/656; max-width: 1268px;"></smartframe-embed></p>
<!-- https://smartframe.io/embedding-support -->
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">And it’s not just a case of someone removing your name from this metadata and adding their own. Serial numbers of cameras and lenses used to capture an image are often embedded within metadata, and there&#8217;s little stopping the particularly motivated thief from simply adding serial numbers of their own equipment to any stolen images.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is compounded by the fact that social media platforms and other services to which images are uploaded may not necessarily support the preservation of this metadata. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">In other words, someone downloading an image that originally had this metadata in place may end up with an image that&#8217;s indistinguishable from one that didn&#8217;t bear it to begin with. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In the US, it’s also possible to register copyright for images with the copyright office. In fact, this is a requirement before a photographer or another creative can file legal proceedings. While this can help to settle a dispute, it wouldn’t do much to counter the initial theft of an image. Indeed, the author may be completely unaware their work has been taken. The fact that this service commands a fee also makes it impractical for large collections. </span></p>
<h3>Making authorship clear</h3>
<p>Embedding information within an image file is a worthwhile practice, but even if this is preserved when used online, this does not immediately communicate who&#8217;s responsible for this image to the online audience. Having this information attached to the image file is one thing, but a<span style="font-weight: 400;"> photographer whose image is being used by a third party (with authorization) would typically expect that their credit visibly appears alongside their work, wherever it’s displayed. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">We’re used to seeing such credits on news sites and other well-known online properties. Such organizations will have certain standards in place, partly to ensure compliance with an image provider&#8217;s terms of use, but also for consistency and transparency regarding an image&#8217;s orgins.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This is in contrast to images displayed on personal websites belonging to photographers and other creatives. While they may bear a caption that identifies the creator, their presence on a personal website implies that they all belong to the website&#8217;s owner, which makes any further accreditation unnecessary. The presence of a watermark – particularly one that clearly identifies the photographer – also negates a separate credit.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">All of this isn’t just a concern for those creating their own original works – it also applies to anyone who may consider buying a print of an image for themselves. </span><span style="font-weight: 400;">Perhaps you’ve seen a painting or another artwork on a social media channel, but there’s no credit. How do you know who to contact if it’s posted without any attribution?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Perhaps the easiest way to find out is to search for the image using the image itself, such as through <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/google-reverse-image-search-everything-you-need-to-know/">Google’s Search By Image</a> feature, but this won’t work for all lesser-known images and it may not necessarily lead you to a legitimate place where you can purchase a copy for yourself. It may simply highlight further instances of a particular image being stolen.</span></p>
<h3>Clarity and trust</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">When an image is uploaded by its creator for the first time – whether it&#8217;s to a personal website, to a social media page, or a third-party website to which they have authorized publication of the image – the creator will have the most control over how this image is captioned. P</span><span style="font-weight: 400;">roblems only begin when the image is copied in some way, without the author&#8217;s authorization, as there is no guarantee any credit will be copied too. So the first issue is preventing the theft of the image to begin with.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">It&#8217;s entirely possible that a person copying such an image <em>will</em> ensure the author is credited where they intend to publish it, and they may even link back to its original location in a bid to make the initial copying fairer. Given how used we are to seeing these images being credited, it&#8217;s reasonable to assume that some people believe this approach makes the action of reproducing the image itself permissible.</span></p>
<p>Regardless of whether such a caption is copied or not, the fact that such a credit will not be a fixed part of the image itself makes this separation likely. So the<span style="font-weight: 400;"> second key issue is that a tamper-proof credit stays with the image at all times. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">SmartFrame already addresses these two issues, and the <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/we-stream-music-and-videos-so-why-not-images/">principle of image streaming</a> allows the creator to adjust this caption at any time. But the next step is to make this caption even more useful. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The example below from <a href="https://www.granger.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Granger</a> shows this in action: an image initially displayed with the publisher&#8217;s website and logo before mouseover behavior switches this to show a caption. When embedded on the publisher&#8217;s website, only the caption shows. But when embedded elsewhere, the attribution shows along with the caption. </span><script async src="https://static.smartframe.io/embed.js"></script><smartframe-embed customer-id="3a09e1e1b4350664c81a1143f53b6df8" image-id="000-8000--tec-cot--0008378" theme="granger-off-site" style="width: 100%; display: inline-flex; aspect-ratio: 3240/3148; max-width: 3240px;"></smartframe-embed><!-- https://smartframe.io/embedding-support --></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">This way, the publisher&#8217;s brand continues to be seen when images are viewed without the context of the website on which they were originally published. And when the viewer requires more information about the image, the attribution momentarily disappears and the caption, along with a link to the original place of publication, appears in its place.</span></p>								</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://smartframe.io/blog/whose-image-is-it-anyway/">Whose image is it anyway? The importance of permanent attribution</a> appeared first on <a href="https://smartframe.io">SmartFrame</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
